Corentin GARIEL

Composition of the Jury

Abstract

The 21st century is characterized by the emergence and amplification of unprecedented problems, distinguished by a global interdependence between human societies and very long-term consequences for global commons such as the oceans, climate, and space. Managing these major challenges (Ferraro et al., 2015) proves particularly complex because it requires the development of collective actions involving a multitude of heterogeneous actors. The role of multinational corporations (MNCs) is particularly debated due to their negative externalities and growing political influence. In this context of major challenges, how are multinational corporations engaging in collective action to organize their corporate social responsibility?

Plastic pollution provides a particularly relevant case study for addressing this question. While negotiations are underway for the adoption of an international treaty regulating plastics, emerging countries (Asia, Africa, Latin America) face a critical situation due to limited waste management infrastructure. Based on a multiple case study conducted in five countries (Ghana, Ivory Coast, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia), the results of this thesis identify the mechanisms by which multinational corporations in the consumer goods industry, such as Coca-Cola, Unilever, Danone, and Nestlé, organize corporate social responsibility.

Due to the limited effectiveness of voluntary and unilateral strategies, these multinational corporations (MNCs) are collectively engaging in meta-organizations. The primary objective of these meta-organizations is to promote and prepare for binding regulations governing their responsibility. The type of regulation advocated by these MNCs to national governments, known as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), is intended to facilitate the organization of collective responsibility within their industry. Crucially, we contribute to the literature on meta-organizations and multi-stakeholder governance. Indeed, the organizational structure of deliberation influences its degree of inclusivity and systemicity, thus either producing or failing to result in binding accountability for MNCs.